The
Citizen Initiated Performance Assessment (CIPA) Initiative
through Wireless Technology
William Stowe,
City of Des Moines, USA
Bill
Stowe is Public Works Director of the City of De Moines,
Iowa. He holds a JD, the Masters of Engineering in Professional
Practice, University of Wisconsin – Madison, a MLIR
and a BA. His email address is wgstowe@ci.des-moines.ia.us.
Many governments, including my own that serves a population
of about 200,000 Central Iowans, have been reluctant to
invest in technologies supporting e-government services.
The operating assumption for this reluctance is that the
“digital divide” delivers the benefits of
e-government to the wealthiest and often most educated
citizens, effectively diverting resources to constituencies
traditionally less reliant on government services than
the poor who are often left on the down side of the “digital
divide”. While “digital divide” considerations
are and should continue to be a focal point in deciding
allocation of scarce financial resources supporting technological
improvements, reallocation of resources to bridge the
“digital divide” should be a countervailing
consideration in debates about the impact of e-government.
Without doubt, this use of technologies to communicate
citizen requests for service is more direct and arguably
more effective than the process available to more affluent
residents, effectively using technologies to turn the
digital divide to the advantage of those less likely to
have ready access to their own technologies.
 |
Recently,
the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation funded a “Citizen
Initiated Performance Assessment” (CIPA) in about
10 Iowa cities and towns, ranging from Iowa’s
capital city, Des Moines, to rural Carroll, a farming
community of about 10,000 residents in Western Iowa. |
The heart of the project empowers neighborhood leaders with
technologies to categorize concerns, photograph them, and
communicate service requests based on these concerns to
the city’s government. For example, citizens can make
government immediately aware of troublesome problems like
broken sidewalks, concerns about “junk” cars
in backyards, or, trees infested with crows. These can be
photographed, along with specific location data and transmitted
to city halls for review by appropriate staffs and, as necessary,
used to generate work orders in response to these citizen
initiated service requests. (See photo above of residents
cataloging a concern with deteriorated curbs.)
In
the context of Des Moines, Iowa, two neighborhoods representing
differing demographics and assumed needs—the Gray’s
Woods Neighborhood (a remote, forested relatively low income
residential neighborhood much of which is located in flood
plain) and the Indianola Hills Neighborhood (a middle income
relatively densely populated area with both residential
and commercial properties)—were selected as the bellwethers
in assessing CIPA within the City of Des Moines’ 50
or so recognized neighborhoods.
The technologies supporting CIPA in Des Moines involves
issuing 2 iPAQ H3850 Color Pocket PC’s (64 MB of SDRAM
memory and a 8MB storage card) with an attached Nexian Digital
Camera CF Pack-Nexi Cam (with a 32 MB flash card for photo
storage) to each neighborhood. CIPA neighborhood activists
[How are these people selected – from church groups
or other sources?] then pass the technologies among one
another to document concerns, in turn, are communicated
with city governments, who, in turn, apportion these inquires
to appropriate service providers (e.g., sidewalk concerns
to Public Works inspectors, nuisance concerns to Community
Development enforcement offices and speeding concerns to
Police Departments). (See iPac photos below.)
| While
currently downloading this data through direct connection
to the city’s network based customer service systems,
wireless connectivity is available by placing a wireless
card in the iPAQ and connecting via radio to the city’s
network. |
|
Conclusions
Although CIPA technologies have only recently been delivered
to citizens in Des Moines, Iowa, this use of technologies
is illustrative of options available to others worldwide.
No doubt the same process that transmits requests for services
from remote neighborhoods in a medium sized Midwestern American
city, could also be used in far more distant environments
to communicate needs nationally to responsible governments.
This model offers an extraordinary opportunity to reverse
the “digital divide” by empowering citizens
with the greatest need for services a direct and unimpeded
link to service providers with a record upon which delivery
metrics can be applied. In so doing, governments can be
more precisely held accountable for their service delivery,
or, placed in a unique position to explain better their
perceived unresponsiveness. Perhaps through leveraging technologies,
the democratic ideals of a better informed citizenry and
responsive governments can be more than the platitudes of
high schools civics instructors; moreover, the presumed
disenfranchisement of the poor by increasing use of technologies
to request and assess government services may be negated
and, through appropriate interventions and resource allocation,
reversed.
For
more information on CIPA see:
http://www.ci.des-moines.ia.us/mayor_council/agendas/2000_as/blue/00-566.htm
http://www.iowacipa.org/downloads/GFOAarticle_Citizen-BasedPM.pdf
http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Connection/2001Summer/citizen.html
http://www.aspanet.org/publications/COLUMNS/
archives/2003/02/kamensky0214.html |